|
| Headline | What´s up with Time? |
|
Page:
[1] |
| Author | Comment |
Phil
May-27-2011, 01:03 GMT
USA - United Staates America
 | Time magazine has always been a big Paul booster. Always positive coverage of new albums - and, of course, the 100 most influential people issue of ´06.
SBOSW has been strangely absent from recent issues. Perhaps they´re saving for later in the year, 70th b-day? Grammy nomination?
|
| | |
Ian
May-27-2011, 01:44 GMT
Australia
 | Hasn´t there even been a review? I hope it´s nothing to do with Paul not being with Warners anymore:-( |
| | |
Phil
May-27-2011, 02:34 GMT
USA - United Staates America
| Ian - you may be on to something with the Warner breakup. no not even a small side story/notice. usually they rave. |
| | |
Ian
May-27-2011, 03:11 GMT
Australia
| Let´s hope we´re wrong about that. What are the alternatives? An oversight? If it is true,I think it´s incredibly petty for a huge company like Time-Warner to behave like that. It was so recent,but I´ve forgotten what was said at the time-was the split acrimonious in any way? |
| | |
Han
May-27-2011, 07:58 GMT
Netherlands
 | Time, time, time, see what´s become of me..... |
| | |
|
Page:
[1]
|