Jay
Dec-17-2010, 01:50 GMT
USA - United Staates America
 | I would like to know who the idiot was that wrote the album guide review of Paul Simon´s music. On the new rolling stone site they have those ratings posted instead of the originals. That moron gave ROTS a two star rating! The original review gave it a four! That´s my favorite album of all time. It´s like Graceland with deeper lyrics... The dummy went on to give Songs From The Capeman a one star rating because it was a flop musical... The original review gave it a four. If I recall correctly the original complaints about SFTC weren´t about the music, they were about the directing and the subject matter. Then the dirty reviewer moves on to give YTO a two star review, and Surprise a three. His complaint about it was literally that Simon sounded like Simon. To think that some one got paid to write that review is just too much. |