|
| Headline | Why Paul doesn´t change set lists much |
|
Page:
[1] |
| Author | Comment |
Proof
Aug-04-2009, 01:42 GMT
USA - United Staates America
 | He wants to get it RIGHT more than he wants to keep it interesting.
By the way, Paul Simon could never have been a Beatle. He never would have named his band after an insect!
|
| | |
Forum guest
Aug-04-2009, 11:57 GMT
United Kingdom
 | Beatles, as in music beat, drum beat, Merseybeat. Not an insect! |
| | |
Kuno
Aug-04-2009, 14:01 GMT
Switzerland
 | Well he releases new recordings exclusively at starBUGS... |
| | |
Gerard
Aug-06-2009, 01:55 GMT
New Zealand
 | well don´t forget he started out with artie where he was named after a rodent - admittedly a cartoon one! |
| | |
massecb
Aug-06-2009, 03:58 GMT
USA - United Staates America
| Haha - Kuno and Gerard.... you are both so creative!
I think you have to respect the Beatles a little bit because they are did (at first) what Paul Simon does everytime: produce sounds that no one had ever heard before.
Personally, I like their music. When someone hears one of their songs on the radio, they never ask, "Do you know who sings this song?" |
| | |
massecb
Aug-06-2009, 04:00 GMT
USA - United Staates America
| Also, not to argue with Proof, because you are right about not changing set lists, but also Paul has said many times that he never tries to replicate work that he has done before, as far as from one cd to another. His policies on writing music are different from performing music I guess... |
| | |
Simon.D
Aug-06-2009, 15:59 GMT
United Kingdom
| .....dont forget also he had no qualms about singing with the Roches! |
| | |
|
Page:
[1]
|